DSpace Repository

Preparation and Characterization of Antifouling Mixed Matrix Ultra filtration Membranes Tailored by UiO-66 and Zeolite 4A for the Removal of Humic Acid

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Tanzila Anjum
dc.date.accessioned 2019-04-09T10:47:28Z
dc.date.available 2019-04-09T10:47:28Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/16539
dc.description PP.59 ;ill en_US
dc.description.abstract Polysulfone (PSf) has intrinsic hydrophobic nature which makes it prone to organic fouling due to the occurrence of organic matter present in water. In this study, in order to prepare antifouling Mixed Matrix Membranes (MMMs), two kinds of porous fillers; UiO-66 and Zeolite 4A and their combination (Zeolite4A@UiO-66) are incorporated in PSf matrix with different loadings (0.5 wt%, 1 wt%, 2 wt%). All membranes were prepared by phase inversion technique. The complimentary effects of nanofillers were investigated on membrane morphology and performance;pure water flux, humic acid rejection, static humic acid adsorption and antifouling properties i.e. Relative Flux Reduction (RFR) and Flux Recovery Ratio (FRR). The morphological characteristics of membranes were investigated with Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) which showed that all MMMs possessed lower roughness as compared to neat PSf membrane. SEM cross section of membranes confirmed that all MMMs possessed wider macrovoids with high nanofiller loadings as compared to neat PSf membrane. According to surface morphology of membranes, all MMMs are prone to agglomeration with high nanofiller loadings and membranes with combine fillers (Zeolite4A@UiO-66) showed more tendency of agglomeration than single filler membranes. Water contact angle results showed that all MMMs exhibited better hydrophilicity than neat PSf membrane and therefore possessed low static humic acid adsorption than neat PSf membrane. All MMMs except Zeolite4A@UiO-66 (1%) membrane showed higher pure water flux than neat PSf membrane. Typical tradeoff between permeability and selectivity was witnessed within single filler MMMs (PSf/Zeolite4A and PSf/UiO-66). PSf/Zeolite4A@UiO-66 membranes didn’t show this tradeoff. All MMMs exhibited low nanofiller loadings (0.5 wt% and 1 wt%) showed improved FRR. Overall, PSf/Zeolite 4A@UiO-66 membranes presented better FRR among all MMMs. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher © Lahore School of Economics en_US
dc.subject Preparation and Characterization en_US
dc.subject Antifouling Mixed Matrix Ultra filtration Membranes en_US
dc.title Preparation and Characterization of Antifouling Mixed Matrix Ultra filtration Membranes Tailored by UiO-66 and Zeolite 4A for the Removal of Humic Acid en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account