dc.description.abstract |
Asset pricing models provide a meaningful measure of the expected return of an asset
which the investor gets by taking on a certain level of risk. Financial theorists have proposed
various asset pricing models that describe the relationship between risk and expected return. The
paradoxes revealed in the statistical results of various empirical tests have influenced the
development of modified asset pricing models, with the aim to improve the ability of the asset
pricing model to explain the relationship between risk and expected return of an investment in
risky assets. It is important for an investor to be able to quantify an appropriate rate of return that
would compensate for taking on risk. An exhaustive literature exists in support and against the
validity of various asset pricing models and the empirical evidence has shown that the relevance
of these asset pricing models differs in developed and emerging markets. KSE is an emerging
market where literature based on the asset pricing proposition is rare as compared to developed
markets.
This research study is a comparative study of four most widely used asset pricing models,
being applied to KSE: Capital asset pricing model (CAPM) , Fama and French-three factor
model( FF, 1992), Intertemporal capital asset pricing model (ICAPM), and Carhart-four factor
model. The purpose of this study is to explore the asset pricing dynamics in an emerging stock.
The four models that are tested in this study have shown explanatory power in developed
economies. However, the emerging markets have special features that are distinct from
developed markets. These include market making activities by few large investors, nonsynchronous
trading, loose monitoring controls and small market size.The research evidence highlights the fact that in emerging markets, the market index is
misrepresented due to thin trading. Active trading exists in only a few stocks. Moreover the
market index is value weighted and is therefore dominated by the stocks which are actively
traded in the market. These factors lead to an insignificant market risk premium. The failure of
CAPM in emerging markets may be due to the fact that the market index does not reflect the
overall market’s dynamics. This is the reason why market risk premium is insignificant in all of
the four models tested in this study.
Fama and French three factor model performs better in emerging markets because this
model takes into account the factors based on firm characteristics, i.e. size and value premium.
Carhart’s four factor momentum model is also relevant because this model takes into account
the trading strategies related to loser and winner stocks in addition to the stocks firm
characteristics. ICAPM performs well due to the fact that it takes into account the changing
investment opportunity set and the affects of business and financial risks on the stocks.
This research would facilitate financial managers and investors to make appropriate
analyses of the risk and return relationship of their investment strategies, enabling them to make
rational investment decisions and maximize their returns as asset pricing propositions are an
important input for estimation of investment appraisals, project feasibility and cost of equity
valuations. |
en_US |